🎬 Johansson and Disney settled the Black Widow pay suit
Two months after filing, terms undisclosed. Disney said it "fully complied" with her contract; her side said Disney breached it. 🗣️
SETTLEDPhoto: Harald Krichel · CC BY-SA 4.0What we know
- Johansson's company, Periwinkle Entertainment, sued Disney in Los Angeles Superior Court on July 29, 2021. It alleged Disney induced Marvel to breach her contract by releasing Black Widow on Disney+ the same day as theaters (The Hollywood Reporter).
- Disney said the suit had “no merit whatsoever” and that it had fully complied with her contract. It also said she had received $20M to date (The Hollywood Reporter, CNN).
- On Aug. 20, 2021, Disney asked the court to send the case to arbitration. It argued the Marvel contract's arbitration clause covered the claims (court filing, as reported by The Hollywood Reporter).
- On Sept. 30, 2021, Disney and Johansson said jointly that they had resolved the dispute. Terms were not disclosed (CNA, The Hollywood Reporter).
Scarlett Johansson and Disney said in a joint statement on Sept. 30, 2021 that they had resolved her lawsuit over Black Widow, two months after it was filed in Los Angeles. The Hollywood Reporter and CNA both report that the terms were not disclosed. A fight that began with a public complaint and a very public press statement ended the way most Hollywood pay disputes do: privately.
What the suit said
The complaint was filed July 29, 2021 in Los Angeles Superior Court by Johansson's company, Periwinkle Entertainment. It alleged that Disney induced its subsidiary Marvel to breach her deal by putting Black Widow on Disney+ Premier Access the same day it opened in theaters, according to The Hollywood Reporter. The deal itself was with Marvel, not Disney, which is why the suit was framed as interference. CNN reported that the suit says her salary was based in large part on the film's box office haul.
The contract, as quoted in the suit, required a “wide theatrical release” of no less than 1,500 screens if the film was released at all. The complaint says that phrase was understood to mean an exclusive theatrical run of roughly 90 to 120 days. Disney's reply, per Variety: the contract never says “exclusive.” To back her reading, the suit includes a 2019 email from Marvel's chief counsel.
By the numbers
- 2 mofrom first to latest entry on record
- 12receipts behind this story
"We understand that should the plan change, we would need to discuss this with you and come to an understanding as the deal is based on a series of (very large) box office bonuses."
Marvel Chief Counsel Dave Galluzzi, in a 2019 email quoted in the lawsuit, as reported by Variety
The statement
Disney answered the same day. A spokesperson said, “There is no merit whatsoever to this filing,” and called the suit “especially sad and distressing in its callous disregard for the horrific and prolonged global effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.” The statement added that Premier Access had “significantly enhanced her ability to earn additional compensation on top of the $20M she has received to date,” per The Hollywood Reporter.
Her agent, CAA co-chairman Bryan Lourd, replied the next day that Disney had “shamelessly and falsely accused Ms. Johansson of being insensitive to the global COVID pandemic.” He said the company had put her salary in a press statement to “weaponize her success as an artist and businesswoman.” Johansson later told Variety, “I was sad and disappointed. But mostly sad.”
A note for the timeline. In 2018 The Hollywood Reporter published a figure for her Black Widow pay, and a Marvel spokesperson answered that “as a matter of policy, we never publicly disclose salaries or deal terms.” In July 2021 a Disney statement put $20M on the record. Different company, different year. Make of that what you will.
The arbitration move
On Aug. 20, Disney's lawyers asked the court to send the case to arbitration. They argued in the filing that Periwinkle had left Marvel out of the suit “in a futile effort to evade this unavoidable result (and generate publicity through a public filing).” Disney also said it had served a demand for confidential arbitration on Aug. 10, according to The Hollywood Reporter. Disney lawyer Daniel Petrocelli had told Variety two weeks earlier that the suit was “a highly orchestrated PR campaign” and that “the written contract is clear as a bell.”
Johansson's lawyer, John Berlinski, said Disney was “predictably, trying to hide its misconduct in a confidential arbitration.” Mr Scandal notes where that ended up.
| Figure | What it is | Who says so |
|---|---|---|
| $20M | Johansson's pay received to date | Disney spokesperson, July 2021 (The Hollywood Reporter, CNN) |
| $50M | Backend pay Johansson's camp speculated she lost | Variety, citing her camp; Disney disputes the claim |
| $367M and $125M | Worldwide box office and streaming/download receipts as of Aug. 15, 2021 | Disney's Aug. 20 filing (The Hollywood Reporter) |
The ending
The joint statement came on Sept. 30. Alan Bergman, Disney Studios chairman, said he was “very pleased that we have been able to come to a mutual agreement” and looked forward to working together on projects including Tower of Terror. Johansson said she was “happy to have resolved our differences with Disney.”
"I'm incredibly proud of the work we've done together over the years and have greatly enjoyed my creative relationship with the team."
Scarlett Johansson, in the joint statement, via CNA
The amount is where the record stops. Variety wrote in May 2023 that the terms were not disclosed but that her payout “reportedly eclipsed $40 million.” That passage names no source for the figure, and neither side is quoted confirming it. The same interview says she remained in business with Disney on Tower of Terror. You can read the whole saga as a pay dispute, a PR duel or a template for the streaming era. The filings, the statements and the settlement announcement are the parts anyone can check.
Quick quiz · 3 questions
Earlier on file: Biggest celebrity lawsuits ranked: Apple's $1B Samsung win leads
The Scarlett Johansson file
- Reported
Johansson and Disney said jointly they had resolved the dispute; terms were not disclosed. This story
- Admitted
Disney and Johansson jointly announced a settlement for an undisclosed amount. Biggest celebrity lawsuits ranked: Apple's $1B Samsung win leads
- Filed
Periwinkle Entertainment, for Scarlett Johansson, sued Disney in Los Angeles Superior Court over Black Widow's Disney+ release. This story
- Filed
Johansson sued Disney over the simultaneous theater and Disney+ release of Black Widow. Biggest celebrity lawsuits ranked: Apple's $1B Samsung win leads
On file: The Scarlett Johansson file · The Marvel Studios file · The The Walt Disney Company file
The Ledger
On the record
- Periwinkle Entertainment sued Disney on July 29, 2021, and Disney moved to compel arbitration on Aug. 20, 2021.
- On Sept. 30, 2021, both sides said they had resolved the dispute; the terms were not disclosed.
Still rumour
- The settlement amount: Variety wrote in 2023 that it reportedly eclipsed $40 million, naming no source in that passage.
- Whether Disney breached the contract: the documents read show no ruling from a court or arbitrator, and the $50 million lost-backend estimate came from Johansson's camp.
That's the record. The rest is rumour. - Mr Scandal
Next on the docket
More Celebrity⚖️ Quentin Tarantino sued Gawker for $1M+, then Miramax sued him
Miramax sued Tarantino over Pulp Fiction NFTs and settled in 2022. He dropped his Gawker suit, THR says; Gawker's reply isn't on record. 📌
Russell Brand sentenced to 10 years for rape, sexual assault
ABC says the sentence is 10 years; its photo caption says 10 years and six months. The reports read name no court and no appeal.
⚖️ Jordon Hudson sues Airbnb hosts over Belichick video leak
The suit claims the hosts leaked Ring video of Belichick; McDevitt told the California Post she has no comment. 🗣️
⚖️ Jordon Hudson sues over video; Andrews won $55M, Hogan $140M
Gawker settled Hogan's $140M verdict for $31M. McDevitt told the California Post she has "no comment" on Hudson's suit.
